The racist, bigoted Mikey Weinstein founder the anti-Christian Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) tries to have General Olson court-martialed for prayer.
According to Godless Mikey Weinstein General Olson committed the crime of publicly sharing “that he was a Christian believer who valued prayer and gave God the credit for his successes at a National Day of Prayer event”
We’ll get back to the case in a second but first I want you to understand that Mikey Weinstein is the prototypical neo-bol which is short for neo-Bolsheviks. The original Bolsheviks were a minority in the pre-soviet Russia. They were not just a minority among the Russian population but their militant atheism made them minority among their own Jewish population. Eventually the Bolsheviks went on to unleash upon the world the worst holocaust and misery ever seen on this planet with over 100 million people, Jews included, killed all over the world- it continues to this day. Keep in mind that while in Russia these Godless Jews, the Bolsheviks, were at first an ostracized minority both among Jews and Russians, that is not the case in America. Here they control key positions in Government, business and the legal system. Let’s pray that the outcome is different but it really doesn’t bode well for our planet.
The ACLJ immediately took action and “sent a letter to General Mark A. Welsh III, Air Force Chief of Staff, pointing out the outlandish tactics employed by Mr. Weinstein (and the MRFF) when he is offended by the religious sentiments expressed by those with whom he disagrees. In this letter, we explained:
Mr. Weinstein’s allegations that General Olson violated the Establishment Clause is ludicrous on its face. General Olson gave a personal testimony about the importance of prayer in his life. No one was required to do or believe anything. The coercive force of the United States Government was not behind his remarks, and no one was compelled to accede to his beliefs or change theirs. . . .
General Olson’s own words indicated without a doubt that he was giving his personal story. He was not acting as a government official when he made his remarks. Hence, it would be unreasonable for anyone to draw the conclusion that he was “officially” endorsing anything.”